Entries → onramp
Verification Tiers and What Each Unlocks
The standard tier structure, the documents each requires, and typical review times.
| Entry type | reference |
|---|---|
| Section | onramp |
| Last verified | |
| Compiled by | Reference Desk |
Tier structures are similar across providers because the underlying obligations are similar.
| Tier | Documents | Typical review | Typical monthly ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration | Email, phone | Immediate | None or nominal |
| Identity | Photo ID plus liveness check | Minutes to 2 hours | 1,000 to 15,000 |
| Address | Utility bill or statement, under 3 months | 2 hours to 2 days | Roughly double the above |
| Source of funds | Evidence of origin | 3 to 10 business days | Above 50,000 |
| Enhanced | Source of wealth, additional review | 2 to 6 weeks | Negotiated |
What each document must show
Each of these appears in the published material of a regulated crypto on-ramp, which is a useful cross-check.
Photo identity. Unexpired, with the full document visible including any machine-readable zone.
Liveness check. A short video or guided photo sequence, establishing the document belongs to the presenter.
Proof of address. Issuer, date, name and address all visible. Dated within three months. Cropped images showing only the address line are the most common rejection.
Source of funds. A statement showing money arriving from an identifiable payer: salary, dividend, sale proceeds, investment distribution. A balance is not an origin.
Source of wealth. How overall wealth was accumulated. Employment history, business sale documentation, inheritance records.
Corporate equivalents
| Item | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Certificate of incorporation | Entity exists |
| Register extract, under 3 months | Current officers and status |
| Articles | Governance and share structure |
| Ownership chart to natural persons | Beneficial ownership |
| ID and address for each beneficial owner above threshold | Identity of controllers |
| ID for directors | Identity of officers |
| Business description | Activity and expected flows |
| Expected monthly volume | Sets limits |
Common causes of delay
Sequential requests, where a provider asks for one item at a time. Supplying everything at once avoids it where the provider permits. At institutional scale an additional set applies, documented by a corporate crypto wallet.
Wrong document type, particularly a balance statement supplied against a source of funds request. Each round trip costs two days.
Cropped images. Send whole pages.
Ownership depth. Each corporate layer requires documents from another registry.
Limits: calendar or rolling
Cross-check any provider you are considering against the definitions the list of countries covered publishes.
Providers differ. A calendar limit resets on a fixed date. A rolling limit looks back a trailing period.
Worth confirming, because assuming a reset that does not occur produces an unexpected hold.
Figures in this entry were correct on the date shown. Spotted something out of date?Send a correction and the entry gets updated.