Entries → comparison tables
Stablecoin Types: Reference Comparison
Three designs, what backs each, how to verify it, and the historical failure record of each category.
| Entry type | comparison |
|---|---|
| Section | comparison tables |
| Last verified | |
| Compiled by | Reference Desk |
Entry last verified September 2026.
The table
| Type | Backed by | Verification | Failure record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiat-backed | Cash and short-dated government debt | Issuer attestation, supervisory reporting where regulated | Brief depegs during banking stress |
| Crypto-collateralised | Over-collateralised crypto in contracts | Directly on-chain | Held through multiple crashes |
| Algorithmic | A mechanism, not collateral | Not verifiable | Repeated total failures |
The third category is included for completeness. It has failed at scale and the mechanism that caused it is inherent to the design.
What to verify for a fiat-backed token
Reserve composition, not the headline total. What the assets are and what maturity they carry.
Where the reserves are held. Concentration at a small number of banks produced the most significant depeg on record, when part of one issuer’s reserves sat at a bank that failed over a weekend.
Who attests, how often, and under what standard. A recognised firm working to a stated standard differs meaningfully from an unnamed one.
Regulatory status. Frameworks in major markets now impose reserve rules, redemption rights and disclosure. An issuer operating under one is supervised in a way an unregulated issuer is not.
Whether you can redeem. Most retail holders cannot redeem directly, which means the peg is maintained for them by arbitrage and exchange liquidity rather than by a right they hold.
What to verify for a crypto-collateralised token
Collateralisation ratio, visible on-chain continuously.
What the collateral is. A token backed largely by other stablecoins inherits their risks.
Liquidation mechanics under stress.
What a stablecoin is not
A bank deposit. No deposit insurance. In an issuer failure, holders are unsecured creditors.
Risk-free yield. Platforms paying a return are lending them out.
Necessarily censorship-resistant. Major fiat-backed issuers can freeze specific addresses and have done so.
The practical exit question
Whether a venue will convert the token to ordinary currency determines whether it is usable as an exit or only as trading collateral.
Which stablecoins have direct currency pairs is published by venues including exchanges quoting a direct fiat pair, and that availability matters more day to day than any attestation.
The regulatory direction
Toward comprehensive frameworks in every major market, with the consequence that the set of stablecoins available to a regulated user narrows toward those whose issuers have obtained authorisation.
For users that is an increase in safety and a reduction in choice, and both effects are real.
Figures in this entry were correct on the date shown. Spotted something out of date?Send a correction and the entry gets updated.