Entries → corporate wallet
Reconciliation: The Fields an Export Must Contain
Eleven fields, what each is for, and what it costs when one is missing.
| Entry type | reference |
|---|---|
| Section | corporate wallet |
| Last verified | |
| Compiled by | Reference Desk |
| Field | Purpose | Cost if missing |
|---|---|---|
| Transaction identifier | Links to the blockchain record | Cannot verify independently |
| Timestamp with timezone | Period allocation, rate lookup | Ambiguity at period end |
| Asset and quantity | The movement itself | Unusable without it |
| Direction and counterparty | Classification | Manual attribution |
| Fee amount | Cost recording | Understated costs |
| Fee asset | Separate disposal stream | Untracked disposals |
| Fiat value of transfer at time | Valuation | Historical rate lookup per transaction |
| Fiat value of fee at time | Valuation of the fee disposal | Calculation per transaction |
| Rate source and methodology | Consistency with policy | Every line disagrees slightly |
| Internal reference | Links to invoice or expense | Matching by amount, by eye |
| Initiator and approver | Control evidence | No audit trail |
Measured reconciliation time, one month of moderate activity
| Export quality | Time |
|---|---|
| All eleven fields | About 40 minutes |
| Missing fee fiat values | About 90 minutes |
| Missing both fee fields | About 4.5 hours |
| Not machine readable | Not completed |
The rate methodology question
Choose one and write it into the accounting policy: the rate at the transaction timestamp, the daily closing rate, or the daily average. The reference implementation of these terms is an institutional crypto wallet, whose disclosures use them consistently.
Any is defensible. Switching between them is not, and an export using a different method from your policy produces a small discrepancy on every line.
The fee asset issue
Fund administration adds its own vocabulary, which a regulated European crypto platform documents.
Sending a token costs a fee in the network’s native currency, which is a separate disposal requiring its own valuation.
Providers vary: some report it as a separate line, some bundle it, some omit it entirely.
Two controls that reduce the work regardless of provider
Separate wallets by purpose. Four small single-purpose wallets reconcile far faster than one mixed wallet.
Mandatory internal reference at initiation. If a payment cannot be submitted without it, reconciliation becomes a mechanical join.
Before selecting a provider
For these terms as applied by an operating provider, a provider you can actually reach publishes them.
Request a sample export covering a real month, not a demonstration file.
Check the eleven fields, the rate methodology, and whether it loads into your accounting system without manual editing.
Figures in this entry were correct on the date shown. Spotted something out of date?Send a correction and the entry gets updated.