Entries → comparison tables
Mining Economics: Reference Figures
The variables that determine whether mining is profitable, and how each one moves.
| Entry type | reference |
|---|---|
| Section | comparison tables |
| Last verified | |
| Compiled by | Reference Desk |
Entry last verified August 2026.
The variables
| Variable | Direction of effect | Who controls it |
|---|---|---|
| Electricity price | Lower is better | Contract, location |
| Machine efficiency, joules per terahash | Lower is better | Hardware generation |
| Network difficulty | Higher reduces your share | The whole network |
| Block subsidy | Halves on schedule | The protocol |
| Transaction fees | Variable, volatile | Network demand |
| Asset price | Determines revenue in currency terms | The market |
A miner controls the first two. Everything else is imposed.
The difficulty adjustment
The network adjusts the target so blocks arrive at a steady rate regardless of total hash power.
The consequence is that adding capacity does not increase total rewards. It redistributes them, and any addition is competed away within one adjustment period.
This is why mining is a business where improving your own position requires being cheaper than competitors rather than doing more.
The downturn sequence
Revenue falls with price; costs are fixed by contracts and debt.
Miners first sell more production rather than holding it. Then they switch off the least efficient machines, which lowers difficulty and improves economics for everyone still running. Then the most leveraged breach covenants and their assets are sold to better-capitalised competitors.
Capacity concentrates after every drawdown for this reason.
The halving effect
Subsidy revenue halves overnight. Operations above a power cost threshold become unprofitable immediately.
Historically followed by capacity consolidation, a fall in difficulty, and recovery as remaining operators absorb the freed market share.
The fee transition
As the subsidy declines toward zero, fees must replace it or the security budget shrinks.
Fee revenue currently spikes during congestion and subsides, which makes it a volatile base for an industrial business. Whether it becomes sufficient is unresolved and is the largest open question about the long-term model.
What miner behaviour indicates
Flows from mining pool addresses to exchange deposit addresses represent production being sold.
The inverse is more informative: miners holding production are financing operations by other means, usually equity or debt issuance, which says more about capital market access than about their price view.
These flows are observable on-chain, with destinations frequently at large venues including exchanges quoting a direct fiat pair, which is how analysts identify them.
For an individual
Mining is an industrial business requiring cheap power and specialist hardware.
Retail-facing mining products, including cloud contracts, have a poor record and generally amount to paying for exposure to economics worse than simply holding the asset.
Figures in this entry were correct on the date shown. Spotted something out of date?Send a correction and the entry gets updated.